Research article | Open Access
Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 2024, Vol. 3(2) 77-86
Exploring Institutional and Partial Meanings in Mathematics: A Model of Structure and Dynamics
pp. 77 - 86 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.2
Publish Date: December 31, 2024 | Single/Total View: 12/25 | Single/Total Download: 19/29
Abstract
This paper explores the dual nature of 'institutional' and 'partial' meanings associated with mathematical entities in an educational setting. The institutional meaning represents the formal understanding endorsed by the mathematical community, while the partial meaning pertains to the limited and evolving comprehension that students possess. Through a theoretical perspective, this research examines how students' progress from partial knowledge toward institutional knowledge, emphasizing the importance of the teacher's role and the educational context in facilitating this transition. The conclusion suggests that the shift to institutional knowledge relies heavily on effective pedagogical mediation and social interaction, which are essential for students to fully grasp mathematical objects.
Keywords: Institutional Meaning, Partial Meaning, Mathematical Objects, Cognitive Development, Mathematics Education
APA 7th edition
Oxley, V. (2024). Exploring Institutional and Partial Meanings in Mathematics: A Model of Structure and Dynamics. Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 3(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.2
Harvard
Oxley, V. (2024). Exploring Institutional and Partial Meanings in Mathematics: A Model of Structure and Dynamics. Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 3(2), pp. 77-86.
Chicago 16th edition
Oxley, Victor (2024). "Exploring Institutional and Partial Meanings in Mathematics: A Model of Structure and Dynamics". Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 3 (2):77-86. https://doi.org/10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.2
- Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar]
- Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students' Potential through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
- Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1996). Cognitively Guided Instruction: Building on the Knowledge of Students and Teachers. Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
- Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching with Vision: The Role of a Vision in Learning to Teach. In D. J. C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 709-716). [Google Scholar]
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Mathematics, Grades 1-5. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hersh, R. (1997). What Is Mathematics, Really? Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kitcher, P. (1983). The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Mason, J., & Spence, J. (2013). Mathematical Thinking: How to Develop It in Your Classroom. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15(1), 73-91. [Google Scholar]
- Oxley, V., & Rolón, V. (2017). Capacitación docente para la enseñanza de matemática. ACADEMO Revista De Investigación en Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 4(2). [https://revistacientifica.uamericana.edu.py/index.php/academo/article/view/73](https://revistacientifica.uamericana.edu.py/index.php/academo/article/view/73) [Google Scholar]
- Oxley Insfrán, V. M. (2020). Complejidad ontológica y enunciados de problemas matemáticos. Revista Científica Estudios E Investigaciones, 9(1), 17-39. [https://doi.org/10.26885/rcei.9.1.17](https://doi.org/10.26885/rcei.9.1.17) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Oxley Insfrán, V. (2024). Educación Matemática Escolar y otros ensayos. Filosofar la realidad en clave analítica. Bubok. [Google Scholar]
- Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rosa, M. I., & Orey, D. C. (2019). Challenging the Traditional View of Mathematics Teaching: The Case of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(1), 45-61. [Google Scholar]
- Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. [Google Scholar]
- Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2011). Mathematics Instruction: A Research-Based Teacher Guide. In H. F. Boaler (Ed.), International Perspectives on Mathematics Curriculum (pp. 179-196). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Tall, D. (2013). How Humans Learn to Think Mathematically: Exploring the Three Worlds of Mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(1), 3-18. [Google Scholar]
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
