JESSM   |  e-ISSN: 2979-9899
Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics
JESSM

Original article | Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 2024, Vol. 3(2) 87-104

Impact of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy on Geometry Performance Among Upper-Basic Students in Nigeria

Kazaik Danlami, Umar A. Ginga, Aliyu S. Aliyu, Ramatu Ematum Umahaba & Muhammad Tsoho

pp. 87 - 104   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.3   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2410-12-0001.R1

Published online: December 31, 2024  |   Number of Views: 11  |  Number of Download: 21

Save PDF

Abstract

Due to the ongoing difficulties in teaching mathematics, especially geometry, in Nigerian schools, new teaching methods are needed to improve student performance. This quasi-experimental research examined how the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) method impacts the geometry performance of upper-basic students in Kaduna North, Nigeria. Two questions were posed for research, and two void hypotheses were examined. The study included 98 students selected from a population of 6300 upper-basic students in Kaduna North. They were split into two groups: an experimental group (n=50) that was taught using the KWL strategy, and a control group (n=48) that received instruction using traditional methods. The researcher created a 28-question multiple-choice Geometry Performance Test (GPT) with a reliability coefficient of 0.86, as determined by Cronbach's alpha. Students were tested before and after to determine how well they performed in geometry. The results showed that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group, with an average score of 23.52 in the post-test, compared to 14.69. ANCOVA analysis revealed a significant impact of the KWL technique on students' achievement (F=242.518, p<.001), explaining 74.5% of the variability (partial η² = .745). Additionally, there were no significant differences between male (M = 19.40, SD = 5.304) and female (M = 18.93, SD = 5.045) students in the experimental group, t(96) = 0.444, p = 0.658.These results indicate that the KWL approach promotes a more profound comprehension and involvement in geometry, and utilizing it could enhance mathematics teaching in Nigerian schools with equality across genders. It is advised to use the KWL strategy for teaching geometry in co-ed and single-sex schools and to organize teacher training sessions and seminars to encourage its adoption by math educators.

Keywords: Know-Want-Learn strategy, Geometry Performance, ANCOVA, Upper-Basic students, Mathematics Education

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Danlami, K., Ginga, U.A., Aliyu, A.S., Umahaba, R.E. & Tsoho, M. (2024). Impact of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy on Geometry Performance Among Upper-Basic Students in Nigeria . Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 3(2), 87-104. doi: 10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.3

Harvard
Danlami, K., Ginga, U., Aliyu, A., Umahaba, R. and Tsoho, M. (2024). Impact of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy on Geometry Performance Among Upper-Basic Students in Nigeria . Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 3(2), pp. 87-104.

Chicago 16th edition
Danlami, Kazaik, Umar A. Ginga, Aliyu S. Aliyu, Ramatu Ematum Umahaba and Muhammad Tsoho (2024). "Impact of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy on Geometry Performance Among Upper-Basic Students in Nigeria ". Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 3 (2):87-104. doi:10.29329/jessm.2024.1110.3.
References
  1. Abu Sultan, C. (2012). The Impact of KWL Strategy in Developing Concepts and Logical Thinking in Mathematics among Ninth Graders, Unpublished Master Thesis, College of Education, Islamic University, Gaza. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajai, J. T., & Ogungbile, T. (2023). Relationship between laboratory method of teaching, students’ attitude and gender on students’ performance in geometry. Journal of Research in Instructional, 3(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al Barakati, N. (2008). The Impact of Teaching Using Multiple Intelligences, Six Hats and KWL Strategies on the Academic Achievement and Mathematical Correlation among Third Intermediate Graders in Makkah, Unpublished Master Thesis, Umm AlQura University, Makk [Google Scholar]
  4. Alsalhi, N. R. (2020). The effects of the use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on fourth-grade students’ achievement in science at the primary stage and their attitudes towards it. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1833. [Google Scholar]
  5. Angoff, W. H. (1984). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. Educational Testing Service. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anokye-Poku, D., & Ampadu, E. (2020). Gender differences in attitudes and achievement in mathematics among Ghanaian JHS Students. International journal of education, 12(3), 84-95. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aseeri, M. M. Y. (2020). Effectiveness of using KWL strategy in teaching mathematics on the achievement and motivation of high school students in Najran City, KSA. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 10(5), 07-15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Attia, I. & Muhammad, S. (2009). Effectiveness of KWL and Think, Pair, Share Strategies in Teaching Mathematics on the Development of Communication and Mathematical Innovation among Primary Stage Students. Journal of the College of Education, Benha University, 18 (76), 50-85 [Google Scholar]
  9. Aydisheh, F. H., & Gharibi, H. (2015). Effectiveness of constructivist teaching method on students’ mathematic academic achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 572-579. [Google Scholar]
  10. Babah, P. K., Ayamah, R., Asase, S. S. Y., & Odei, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy on Ghanaian Basic Five Pupils’ Achievements in Mathematics. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 19(9), 32-45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bassey, S. W., Joshua, M. T., & Asim, A. E. (2011). Gender Differences and Mathematics Achievement of Rural Senior. Mathematics Connection, 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Biplob, K. B. M. B., Islam, Y. M., & Rahman, M. S. (2017). Engaging Students to Take Ownership of Their Learning Through A Stepped Teaching Model Based On The Qur’an: Evaluation By Teachers Trained Using This Model. Journal of Education Science, 1(1). [Google Scholar]
  13. Brame, C. (2013). Writing good multiple-choice test questions. Centre for Teaching Vanderbilt University. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Ascd. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carr, E., & Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L Plus: A Strategy for Comprehension and Summarization. Journal of Reading, 30, 626 – 631 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chanakan, P. (2015). The Impact of Using Know-Want-Learn Strategy on Students ‘Achievement and Attitude in Learning Mathematics of 10th Grade Students. The International Conference on Language, Education, Humanities & Innovation. 99 – 104. [Google Scholar]
  17. Danlami, K. B., Ayuba, I., & Ayuba, E. (2024). Effects of Know-Want-Learn (KWL) strategy on retention in geometry among upper-basic students in Kaduna north, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 5(2), 139-149. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dogani, B. (2023). Active learning and effective teaching strategies. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 136-142. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dolati Miandoab, A., & Farrokhi, N. (2019). Comparison of the effect of KWL educational strategy and concept mapping strategy on students’ critical thinking. Iranian journal of educational sociology, 2(3), 27-35. [Google Scholar]
  20. Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., & Walters, A. (2023). Defining Active Learning: A Restricted Systemic Review. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 11, 1-23 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. [Google Scholar]
  22. Etsu, S.M.& Manko, U.A. (2019). Impacts of Mathematics Peer Tutoring Strategy on Geometry Achievement of Slow Learners Among Junior Secondary School Students in Niger State. Abacus, the Journal of Mathematical Association of Nigeria, 44(1),551-559 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fajri, F. A. (2015). Improving students’ reading comprehension through KWL (know, want to know, learn) strategy (A Classroom Action Research in the Class of Year Ten of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar in the Academic Year 2014/2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Festus, A. B. (2013). Activity-based learning strategies in the mathematics classrooms. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(13), 8-14. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fixen, M., & Wald, N. (2021). Obstacles Overcome: A Universal Guide to Active Learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(4). [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415 [Google Scholar]
  27. Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ijeoma, N. M., Ogechi, N. G. S., Onyinyechi, D. A., & Ngozi, N. P. (2024). Effects of KWL Instructional Strategy on Academic Performance of Pupils in Primary Mathematics and English in Owerri North Lga of Imo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(2), 254-262. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jayantika, I. G. A. N. T., & Diansari, D. (2023). Improving students' learning outcomes through the know-want-learned (KWL) strategy. Transformation: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 51-63. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory Into Practice, 43(4):268–273. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumari, S. N., & Jinto, M. (2014). Effectiveness of KWL metacognitive strategy on achievement in social science and metacognitive ability concerning cognitive styles. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(1), 94. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lawal, I. (2020). Impact of Computer-Aided Instruction on the Performance of Senior Secondary School Students in Geometry in Katsina, Katsina State, Nigeria. International Journal of Management, Social Sciences, Peace and Conflict Studies (IJMSSP).3(2),124-129 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lei, B., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st-century learning. Bao and Koenig Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1(2), 1-12 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., & Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8-43. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mok, M. M. C., Lung, C. L., Cheng, D. P. W., Cheung, H. P. C., & Ng, M. L. (2006). Self-Assessment in Higher Education: Experience in Using a Metacognitive Approach in Five Case Studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 415 – 433 [Google Scholar]
  36. Motseki, P. D., Luneta, K., & Coetsee, S. C. (2023). The influence of different teaching and learning strategies in mathematics-a case study. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 98-117. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nanda, D. W., & Pratama, D. (2021). Exploring The Application of KWL Strategy Towards Students’ Reading Comprehension: Teachers’ Perceptions. Journal of English Language Studies, 6(2), 185-194. [Google Scholar]
  38. Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100701. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nwoke, B.I. (2015). Impact of Problem-Solving Approach on Senior Secondary Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 6(1), 27-33 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pandya, S. (2015), Interactive Impact of Metacognitive Strategies-Base Instruction in Mathematics and Approaches to Learning on Mathematics Anxiety of Students. International Journal of Education and Psychology Research (IJEPPR),4(1), 85- 92 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pennington, M. (2009). The Dark Side of the KWL Reading Strategy. Retrieved from     www.penningtonpublishing.com [Google Scholar]
  43. Pereira, J., Wijaya, T.T., Zhou,Y. & Purnama,A.(2021). Learning Points, Lines and Plane Geometry with Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1882(2021), 12-57 [Google Scholar]
  44. Qawasmi, R. (2019). The Effectiveness of Previous Knowledge Activation (KWL) Strategy in Improving the Quality of Female Students’ Learning of Mathematics at School. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. [Google Scholar]
  45. Russel, D. (2014). What Is Geometry?  Retrieved from www.math.about.com/od/Geometry/A/Why Geo.Htm On 19th November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  46. Salman, M. F., & Adeniyi, C. O. (2012). Influence of Teachers' Qualification and Experience on Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics. Abacus, The Journal of Mathematical Association of Nigeria, 37(1), 134-141 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sari, K. I., Astrid, A., & Salsabila, M. (2023). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension by Using KWL (Know, Want to Know, Learned) Strategy. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 3(2), 183-194. [Google Scholar]
  48. Stephen, L. (2018). Impact of Jigsaw II and Guided Discovery Strategies on Retention and Academic Performance in Geometry Among Junior Secondary School Students in Zaria Metropolis, Nigeria. Unpublished M. ED Dissertation, Department of Science Education, ABU, Zaria. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suhendi, A., & Purwarno, (2018). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Contribution to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. 1st annual International Conference on Language and Literature, Kne Social Sciences,87 – 95 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sulistiowati, D. L., Herman, T., & Jupri, A. (2018). Students’ geometry skills are viewed from van Hiele's thinking level. 5th ICRIEMS Proc, 55-62. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sunzuma, G., Masocha, M., & Zezekwa, N. (2013). Secondary school students’ attitudes towards their learning of geometry: a survey of Bindura urban secondary schools. Greener Journals, 23(5), 23 - 32 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thomas, B. M. & Swamy S. S. (2014). Brain-Based teaching approach – a new paradigm of teaching. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 3(2), 62-65 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tok, Ş. (2013). Effects of the know-want-learn strategy on students’ mathematics achievement, anxiety and metacognitive skills. Metacognition and learning, 8, 193-212. [Google Scholar]
  54. Turgut, M., Smith, J. L., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2022). Symbolizing lines and planes as linear combinations in a dynamic geometry environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100948. [Google Scholar]
  55. Usta, N., & Yılmaz, M. (2020). Impact of the KWL reading strategy on mathematical problem-solving achievement of primary school 4th graders. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(5), 343-363. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wei, J. M. (2013). Analysis of gender in interaction. [Google Scholar]
  57. Widyari, N. K. R., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Saputra, I. N. P. H. (2022). Teaching reading with KWL strategy during online learning. Journal of Educational Study, 2(2), 177-186. [Google Scholar]
  58. World Health Organisation (2024). Gender and health. Retrieved: https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wrigley-Asante, C., Ackah, C. G., & Frimpong, L. K. (2023). Gender differences in academic performance of students studying Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the University of Ghana. SN Social Sciences, 3(1), 12. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yustisia, K. K., Lailiyah, M., & Fitriana, C. L. (2023). Sustaining class interaction and collaborative learning in a virtual classroom. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 6(2), 162-171. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 3 Issue 2

December 2024

All Articles

Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics

JESSM.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2025 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.